Then I must be in the same minority.
Activision laying off nearly 800
Re: Activision laying off nearly 800
01000010 01111001 01110100 01100101 00100000 01101101 01100101 00100001
- Semi-Happy Partygoer
- Oldbie
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2017 11:44 pm
Re: Activision laying off nearly 800
Ditto.
"It is better to know some of the questions than all of the answers" - James Thurber
- Tawmis
- Grand Poobah's Servant
- Posts: 20960
- Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 1:19 am
- Gender: Not Specified
- Contact:
Re: Activision laying off nearly 800
If it's an offline game, I agree. If it's an online game, of any kind, while I don't do any of the micro-transactions, I completely understand why they're there.
Tawmis.com - Voice Actor
Comic Relief Podcast!
Neverending Nights
Hello, my name is Larry. Larry Laffer!
Comic Relief Podcast!
Neverending Nights
Hello, my name is Larry. Larry Laffer!
- Rath Darkblade
- The Cute One
- Posts: 12965
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 5:15 am
- Location: Lost in Translation
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: Activision laying off nearly 800
No, you're not alone, DPX. I don't play games on my mobile phone, because it drains the battery really, really quickly, and I care about battery life.
I also expect a higher price for my PC games, and don't mind paying it. However, before I fork over my hard-earned, I look very carefully at what I get for it, and whether my (admittedly middle-aged) computer can run it.
That's all. If a game costs more because it's on a PC, I don't mind paying more, provided that I get my money's worth. I, too, would rather not have to deal with ads and micro-transactions.
I also expect a higher price for my PC games, and don't mind paying it. However, before I fork over my hard-earned, I look very carefully at what I get for it, and whether my (admittedly middle-aged) computer can run it.
That's all. If a game costs more because it's on a PC, I don't mind paying more, provided that I get my money's worth. I, too, would rather not have to deal with ads and micro-transactions.