Re: Cool and Interesting News & Such.
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:16 am
You can bet women are already plotting on how to get to that planet...
Keeping Sierra On-Line Alive
http://forums.sierrahelp.com/
I didn't know this, so thanks for sharing. Normally I'd be concerned, but Disney owns Marvel Comics and has done a fantastic job with those films, so I figure they won't do any worse than Lucas did himself.
I can't vouch for DPX, but what I got out of the Cracked article to which DPX linked was Disney, now the rights-holder for Monkey Island, could easily pull it from store shelves, both digital and physical, for being too close to Pirates of the Carribean. Besides, in the various articles I've read, Disney's statements quite clearly indicate they are uninterested in any LucasFilm property except Star Wars. Ergo, I doubt they'd even touch Monkey Island - or any other non-Star Wars property for that matter.Rath Darkblade wrote:Hmmm... this is worrying. So will Disney completely kiddify Monkey Island? Yuck... What a bleak and horrible future that promises to be.
What do you think, DPX?
I don't think Disney will "kiddify" the Monkey Island series. They didn't do that with their Marvel movies, so I still hope. That is, of course, unless Disney pulls all support for Monkey Island, which it'd technically be within its rights to do.Rath Darkblade wrote:Hmmm... this is worrying. So will Disney completely kiddify Monkey Island? Yuck... What a bleak and horrible future that promises to be.
What do you think, DPX?
Expack3 wrote: I can't vouch for DPX, but what I got out of the Cracked article to which DPX linked was Disney, now the rights-holder for Monkey Island, could easily pull it from store shelves, both digital and physical, for being too close to Pirates of the Carribean.
Yeah, from what we've read, Disney seems primarily interested in Star Wars. That said, they have a ride called Indiana Jones Adventure: Temple of the Forbidden Eye at Disneyland (along with Star Tours), so it seems they had some sort of deal with Lucas early on.Expack3 wrote:Besides, in the various articles I've read, Disney's statements quite clearly indicate they are uninterested in any LucasFilm property except Star Wars. Ergo, I doubt they'd even touch Monkey Island - or any other non-Star Wars property for that matter.
Maybe the imaginary part is meant as an insurance so bullies can't say that it was just play/for fun if they pick a fight with someone?DeadPoolX wrote:Here are a few interesting stories:
1. A seven year-old boy was suspended because he was playing an imaginary game on the school's playground. Apparently he decided to throw an imaginary grenade (no physical object) into a sandbox with imaginary bad guys. The elementary school he goes to has a "no fighting and no weapons, real or imaginary" rule in place. I can understand the real portion of that, but killing the imagination of young children? Moronic.
It's simply an overreaction, brought upon by zero tolerance policies many schools in the US have. Basically, they hide behind these policies so they can use a "one-solution-fits-all" approach and don't have to actually consider the circumstances and students involved. It's lazy, and to be honest, stupid, but not surprising given that most businesses in the US (and schools count) are paranoid of lawsuits.Moon Dragon wrote:Maybe the imaginary part is meant as an insurance so bullies can't say that it was just play/for fun if they pick a fight with someone?DeadPoolX wrote:Here are a few interesting stories:
1. A seven year-old boy was suspended because he was playing an imaginary game on the school's playground. Apparently he decided to throw an imaginary grenade (no physical object) into a sandbox with imaginary bad guys. The elementary school he goes to has a "no fighting and no weapons, real or imaginary" rule in place. I can understand the real portion of that, but killing the imagination of young children? Moronic.