Page 2 of 2
Re: Activision laying off nearly 800
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:29 pm
by Collector
DeadPoolX wrote: ↑Sat Feb 16, 2019 10:02 pm
I'd rather pay once up front and never have to deal with micro-transactions or ads, but apparently I'm in the minority there.
Then I must be in the same minority.
Re: Activision laying off nearly 800
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 12:16 am
by Semi-Happy Partygoer
Collector wrote: ↑Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:29 pm
DeadPoolX wrote: ↑Sat Feb 16, 2019 10:02 pm
I'd rather pay once up front and never have to deal with micro-transactions or ads, but apparently I'm in the minority there.
Then I must be in the same minority.
Ditto.
Re: Activision laying off nearly 800
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:44 am
by Tawmis
Semi-Happy Partygoer wrote: ↑Sun Feb 17, 2019 12:16 am
Collector wrote: ↑Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:29 pm
DeadPoolX wrote: ↑Sat Feb 16, 2019 10:02 pm
I'd rather pay once up front and never have to deal with micro-transactions or ads, but apparently I'm in the minority there.
Then I must be in the same minority.
Ditto.
If it's an offline game, I agree. If it's an online game, of any kind, while I don't do any of the micro-transactions, I completely understand why they're there.
Re: Activision laying off nearly 800
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2019 3:56 am
by Rath Darkblade
No, you're not alone, DPX.
I don't play games on my mobile phone, because it drains the battery really,
really quickly, and I care about battery life.
I also expect a higher price for my PC games, and don't mind paying it. However, before I fork over my hard-earned, I look very carefully at what I get for it, and whether my (admittedly middle-aged) computer can run it.
That's all. If a game costs more because it's on a PC, I don't mind paying more, provided that I get my money's worth. I, too, would rather not have to deal with ads and micro-transactions.