The treasure chest ... maybe it's supposed to symbolise "fantasy"? Or maybe it's to mislead people into thinking that the knight is a red herring, and it's really a pirate game. Honestly, I've no idea.notbobsmith wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:46 am Why is there a treasure chest in the background? Why does it look larger than the trees?
Perspective, possibly -- because the treasure chest is closer?
Agreed -- although (and this is me getting technical), that armour is definitely late 14th- or early-15th century, i.e. Late Middle Ages or getting close to the Renaissance. During that period, some knights were using kite-shaped shields (to protect their torso and legs), or using no shield at all and relying on their horses and armour for protection.notbobsmith wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:46 am And the knight - the way he is holding the shield doesn't make any sense. It looks like he is missing his left arm and the shield is just attached somehow to his torso.
Steel plate is very, very protective (and nowhere near as heavy as most people seem to think), although it IS vulnerable to crushing blows, e.g. from warhammers.
Not all knights could afford steel plate, though. Poorer knights (i.e. those who didn't own that much land) either went with maille (generally known as chain-mail) or brigandine armour, and used shields -- the bigger and more protective, the better.
Hmm, that's funny. I never paid much attention to those motion lines, but here's something else: for him to do this, his right arm (the sword-arm) would somehow have to swing around the shield that he's already holding in his left hand ... yeesh.notbobsmith wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:46 am The motion lines look like he has finished swing his sword, but the way his arm is positioned it looks like he is preparing to thrust.
If he tried this in real life, his sword would CLANG-NG-NG-NG (etc.) into his own shield.
Nerd alert - you're thinking of faulds. From wikipedia:notbobsmith wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:46 am A piece of armor from his leg overlaps that medal "skirt" he is wearing.
wikipedia wrote:Faulds are pieces of plate armour worn below a breastplate to protect the waist and hips, which began to appear in Western Europe from about 1370. They consist of overlapping horizontal lames of metal, articulated for flexibility, that form an apron-like skirt in front.
That's true. The narrow "wasp waist" and torso reminds me of (dare I say it?) a bikini model. There, I said it.notbobsmith wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:46 am His waist is hidden by the shield, but must be super narrow, with much wider hips. His legs then seem to bow out from his hips.
But it's a mistake to think that knights had to be bulky. The most important thing for knights (and other warriors) is endurance. Guys who could win sword fights didn’t necessarily have amazing physiques, but they had great control of their core, and therefore their weapons. They trained for years in armour, so they knew how to move in it. They had fought in their armor, so they had the endurance to carry an extra 30 pounds or so and not wear out. You didn’t have to be particularly big or strong; you had to be motivated and fit.
For your enjoyment: We fought as knights (so you don’t have to) - The Boston Globe