Page 1 of 1

'Bourne' to be Wild.

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 10:17 pm
by Tawmis
http://blog.movies.yahoo.com/blog/1179- ... ourne-star

Four years ago, Jeremy Renner was playing second-fiddle to Minnie Driver in critically reviled movies. (And starring in canceled television series.) Then he made a little movie called "The Hurt Locker." Since then, he has been nominated for two Oscars, been cast as a superhero and is anchoring two of the most valuable action franchises on earth. We'd say making "Locker" was a smart career move.

Last night, Deadline announced the news everyone had been waiting for: The role of the superspy character replacing Matt Damon's Jason Bourne in the "Bourne" franchise has been offered to Renner, who's expected to join on as soon as scheduling issues are resolved. Universal had been looking at several other actors -- including "Animal Kingdom"'s Joel Edgerton and Garrett Hedlund from "Tron: Legacy" -- but they landed on Renner for "The Bourne Legacy." "Legacy" is written and directed by Tony Gilroy (who wrote all three of the "Bourne" screenplays and also wrote and directed "Michael Clayton") and is expected to start filming this September, with a release date around August 2012.

Renner, who, again, was unknown only three years ago, is taking on projects like a starving man suddenly put in front of a buffet. (Even though he's new to the scene, he has been around a long time; he turns 40 this year.) He just finished filming "Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol" with Tom Cruise -- it is anticipated that he will take over that franchise, though he's actually only nine years younger than Cruise -- and he also will play "Hawkeye" in the upcoming "Avengers movie." (He's said to have a cameo as Hawkeye in this summer's "Thor" as well.)

Finding the right actor was key for Universal to keep the "Bourne" franchise alive. When director Paul Greengrass announced he was done with the "Bourne" films, star Matt Damon said he would leave the franchise too, claiming he would only work with Greengrass. (He has since left the door ajar for "five years from now.") Universal couldn't let such a profitable franchise die, though, so they gave Gilroy the director's chair and set about casting a new lead, someone who is not Jason Bourne, but is certainly cut from his proverbial cloth. That person was Renner. Hence the "Legacy" of the title: The hope is that someday Damon and Renner can team for a future Super Bourne Film. (The legacy aspect is still strange, though; Damon is just one year older than Renner.)

But yes: We have gone from never having heard of Jeremy Renner to having him take over all aspects of entertainment, in three years. Look out: Someone's gonna cast him as Batman next.

Re: 'Bourne' to be Wild.

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 11:25 pm
by dotkel50
I just noticed that there are now 10 Jason Bourne books. The author, Robert Ludlum, died in 2001 and the last Bourne book he wrote came out in 1990. It was the third and last in the trilogy. Then in 2004 Eric von Lustbader comes out with Bourne #4, written "with" Robert Ludlum. Mr. Ludlum was a very good author, I've read many of his other books, as well as the Bourne trilogy. Amazing that he can keep writing from the grave. :shock:

Re: 'Bourne' to be Wild.

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 11:29 pm
by Tawmis
dotkel50 wrote:I just noticed that there are now 10 Jason Bourne books. The author, Robert Ludlum, died in 2001 and the last Bourne book he wrote came out in 1990. It was the third and last in the trilogy. Then in 2004 Eric von Lustbader comes out with Bourne #4, written "with" Robert Ludlum. Mr. Ludlum was a very good author, I've read many of his other books, as well as the Bourne trilogy. Amazing that he can keep writing from the grave. :shock:
There are some books by Christopher Tolkien that say "Written with J.R.R. Tolkien" - I imagine it must be the original author's notes, and the close, trusted person who has said notes, is basing their story off those notes.

Re: 'Bourne' to be Wild.

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 11:47 pm
by dotkel50
That's true in many instances and possibly even true for a 4th or 5th Bourne, but 10 of them? I think not. Ludlum died 11 years after he wrote his last Bourne book. He wrote many other books after that. If he wrote that many notes, why not write those books himself. Nothing against von Lustbader, but why not just claim those last 6 books as his own and say "based on a character by Robert Ludlum".
Just my 2 cents.