Civil War Generals 2 and Robert E. Lee:Civil War General
-
- Noob
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:43 am
Civil War Generals 2 and Robert E. Lee:Civil War General
The official unofficial site for Sierra's CWG2 (and Robert E. Lee: Civil War General) is http://groups.msn.com/CWG2/messages.msnw. Online play is available at http://kali.net/. How to register for Kali is explained on the CWG2 site.
Re: Civil War Generals 2 and Robert E. Lee:Civil War General
Thanks for the info. If the Sierra Super group happens, these could be added.
01000010 01111001 01110100 01100101 00100000 01101101 01100101 00100001
- Tawmis
- Grand Poobah's Servant
- Posts: 20946
- Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 1:19 am
- Gender: Not Specified
- Contact:
Re: Civil War Generals 2 and Robert E. Lee:Civil War General
I've never played Civil War - but I am curious - are they RTS games?
Tawmis.com - Voice Actor
Comic Relief Podcast!
Neverending Nights
Hello, my name is Larry. Larry Laffer!
Comic Relief Podcast!
Neverending Nights
Hello, my name is Larry. Larry Laffer!
Re: Civil War Generals 2 and Robert E. Lee:Civil War General
Yes. It is an Impressions game: http://www.mobygames.com/game/win3x/rob ... ar-general
01000010 01111001 01110100 01100101 00100000 01101101 01100101 00100001
- DeadPoolX
- DPX the Conqueror!
- Posts: 4833
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 3:00 pm
- Gender: XY
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: Civil War Generals 2 and Robert E. Lee:Civil War General
While I've never played the Civil War Generals series, I did tackle Sid Meier's Gettysburg, which was a lot of fun. Was CWG 1 and 2 anything like that?
"Er, Tawni, not Tawmni, unless you are doing drag."
-- Collector (commenting on a slight spelling error made by Tawmis)
-- Collector (commenting on a slight spelling error made by Tawmis)
-
- Noob
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Civil War Generals 2 and Robert E. Lee:Civil War General
The difference is perhaps best explained in an old review, http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:E7 ... firefox-a.:
These are truly the best of times for Civil War gamers; first Firaxis comes up big with Sid Meier's Gettysburg!, with its real-time tactical combat engine, and now Sierra delivers the goods with Civil War Generals 2, a turn-based game that allows you to refight the entire Civil War - battle by battle, campaign by campaign. Make no mistake: the two games are very different, both in scale and in gameplay, and in many ways Civil War Generals comes off looking less sophisticated than SMG. The graphics are a bit dated, the game's mechanics are scarcely revolutionary, and the game interface is oh so Windows 3.1 - but the bottom line is that CWG2 does what it sets out to do. That is to produce a fun, historically accurate, good-looking game that allows you to fight every major and most minor battles of the American Civil War at the regiment/brigade level.
These are truly the best of times for Civil War gamers; first Firaxis comes up big with Sid Meier's Gettysburg!, with its real-time tactical combat engine, and now Sierra delivers the goods with Civil War Generals 2, a turn-based game that allows you to refight the entire Civil War - battle by battle, campaign by campaign. Make no mistake: the two games are very different, both in scale and in gameplay, and in many ways Civil War Generals comes off looking less sophisticated than SMG. The graphics are a bit dated, the game's mechanics are scarcely revolutionary, and the game interface is oh so Windows 3.1 - but the bottom line is that CWG2 does what it sets out to do. That is to produce a fun, historically accurate, good-looking game that allows you to fight every major and most minor battles of the American Civil War at the regiment/brigade level.
Re: Civil War Generals 2 and Robert E. Lee:Civil War General
Citation : "The graphics are a bit dated, the game's mechanics are scarcely revolutionary, and the game interface is oh so Windows 3.1"
I do not agree with : Graph are very correct if you consider what are gaphs in actual PC wargamesi, 2D and turn-based (like Strategic Command, Commander Europe at war, etc etc) : thse are not better than CWG2, I think
Game's mechanics is very high level : no actual ststem of wargame can rivalize with the synthetic and very clear system of CWG2
Interface is a little bit old, but also clear and practical.
Probably one of the best wargames never made. I mod it for the Eastern Front (posted here message about that in other thread), and this game is very funny
I do not agree with : Graph are very correct if you consider what are gaphs in actual PC wargamesi, 2D and turn-based (like Strategic Command, Commander Europe at war, etc etc) : thse are not better than CWG2, I think
Game's mechanics is very high level : no actual ststem of wargame can rivalize with the synthetic and very clear system of CWG2
Interface is a little bit old, but also clear and practical.
Probably one of the best wargames never made. I mod it for the Eastern Front (posted here message about that in other thread), and this game is very funny