Lord of the Rings comes to D&D Beyond.
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2024 1:31 am
This. Is. Epic.
Keeping Sierra On-Line Alive
http://forums.sierrahelp.com/
My (former) boss bought it on D&D Beyond - and since I am in one of his games and he has content sharing turned on - I've been reading through it.Rath Darkblade wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:11 pm Here' what it looks like: https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/lotrr
It's time to go on an adventure!
Don't forget the Munchkins. Or are they also known as "minmaxers"?Tawmis wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2024 7:09 pmMy (former) boss bought it on D&D Beyond - and since I am in one of his games and he has content sharing turned on - I've been reading through it.Rath Darkblade wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:11 pm Here's what it looks like: https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/lotrr
It's time to go on an adventure!
Phew. It's D&D 5th Edition. With LOTS of changes. And complexity.
But they HAD to kind of do that, because D&D is so vast - Wizards are a common place, the types of spells range into the thousands, and what not.
They had some cool dynamics too, like "Shadow Points" - if you do something questionable, you gain Shadow Points, and fall under the influence of the enemy type of thing.
Really good stuff.
But would require the players to be INTO Roleplaying for it to REALLY work.
D&D has all kinds of players.
You have those that love to step into character.
You have those that just like to minmax (make the best possible character).
You have those that just like to roll dice and damage things.
You have those that are there because of the social aspect of it.
And sometimes, a mixture of all of those.
This game, really feels like it needs you to step into character - at the very least - to make it feel right.
Yeah. I called them out for sure. I've only really experienced two people in a group I was in that did this.Rath Darkblade wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:12 pmDon't forget the Munchkins. Or are they also known as "minmaxers"?Tawmis wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2024 7:09 pmMy (former) boss bought it on D&D Beyond - and since I am in one of his games and he has content sharing turned on - I've been reading through it.Rath Darkblade wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:11 pm Here's what it looks like: https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/dnd/lotrr
It's time to go on an adventure!
Phew. It's D&D 5th Edition. With LOTS of changes. And complexity.
But they HAD to kind of do that, because D&D is so vast - Wizards are a common place, the types of spells range into the thousands, and what not.
They had some cool dynamics too, like "Shadow Points" - if you do something questionable, you gain Shadow Points, and fall under the influence of the enemy type of thing.
Really good stuff.
But would require the players to be INTO Roleplaying for it to REALLY work.
D&D has all kinds of players.
You have those that love to step into character.
You have those that just like to minmax (make the best possible character).
You have those that just like to roll dice and damage things.
You have those that are there because of the social aspect of it.
And sometimes, a mixture of all of those.
This game, really feels like it needs you to step into character - at the very least - to make it feel right.
In the video they said that sometimes, people unfamiliar with Lord of the Rings make for the best players, because they may not know what else is going on, and easily avoid "meta-gaming."Rath Darkblade wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:12 pm And I agree: if you want to play a LOTR character, you really need to be that character; you have to FEEL what that character feels at any given moment - to smell the musty smells of Moria or the verdant scents of flowers in Lothlórien; to be at peace in the Shire or on the alert in Bree (after the Nazgûl invasion); you have to try and spot Gollum following the Fellowship. Not only that, you're limited by what your character knows, and you can only see and hear what he/she can see and hear.
If you're (say) one of the Guards in the Citadel of Gondor, you won't know very much about what's happening in (say) Fangorn or Beleriand, or The Shire. If you're a Hobbit of The Shire, you will have no idea about what a Ringwraith is.
They talk about the game takes place during the Third Age. So you could technically play before it, during it, or after the series of books.Rath Darkblade wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:12 pmFinally, the whole thing depends on which time period you're playing. Is "D&D LOTR" a reproduction of The War of The Ring? Or before it? Or after it? The history of Middle-Earth is seriously huge. There are so many possibilities.
Hmm. I think LOTR would be best for those that love to step into character (the "true" roleplayers, whatever that means).Tawmis wrote: ↑Sun Dec 01, 2024 8:24 pmIn the video they said that sometimes, people unfamiliar with Lord of the Rings make for the best players, because they may not know what else is going on, and easily avoid "meta-gaming."Rath Darkblade wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:12 pm And I agree: if you want to play a LOTR character, you really need to be that character; you have to FEEL what that character feels at any given moment - to smell the musty smells of Moria or the verdant scents of flowers in Lothlórien; to be at peace in the Shire or on the alert in Bree (after the Nazgûl invasion); you have to try and spot Gollum following the Fellowship. Not only that, you're limited by what your character knows, and you can only see and hear what he/she can see and hear.
If you're (say) one of the Guards in the Citadel of Gondor, you won't know very much about what's happening in (say) Fangorn or Beleriand, or The Shire. If you're a Hobbit of The Shire, you will have no idea about what a Ringwraith is.
So ... the War of the Last Alliance is out, then? Or the War of the Silmarils? (Because they're both in the First Age?)Tawmis wrote: ↑Sun Dec 01, 2024 8:24 pmThey talk about the game takes place during the Third Age. So you could technically play before it, during it, or after the series of books.Rath Darkblade wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:12 pmFinally, the whole thing depends on which time period you're playing. Is "D&D LOTR" a reproduction of The War of The Ring? Or before it? Or after it? The history of Middle-Earth is seriously huge. There are so many possibilities.
Not at all. Players just need to understand that some game masters may change some things, so it's not exactly like the books.Rath Darkblade wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 3:16 am I'd love to play D&D LOTR, but there aren't any D&D clubs in my town. Trouble is, I'm extremely familiar with LOTR (I love it! See the LOTRO thread! ), but that might make me unsuited for playing it.
Not at all. The game is giving you the foundation. You could play in the Sixth Age, which doesn't even exist, if you wanted to.Rath Darkblade wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 3:16 am So ... the War of the Last Alliance is out, then? Or the War of the Silmarils? (Because they're both in the First Age?)
The Lord of the Rings MMO does this. Your character is helping, but not a part of, the Fellowship.Rath Darkblade wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 3:16 am Even if you play in The War of the Ring, it doesn't mean that people have to roleplay the Fellowship. The Fellowship went south. Your group could easily go north, and try to keep the peace in places like Fornost and Gundabad, etc. (That's what happens in the video game "LOTR: War in the North"). Fornost is abandoned, and is infested by goblins and giant spiders - slay them to free your giant eagle buddy that they captured!