Spider-Man (Movie Reboot)

Talk about anything you want here
User avatar
DeadPoolX
DPX the Conqueror!
Posts: 4833
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 3:00 pm
Gender: XY
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Spider-Man (Movie Reboot)

Post by DeadPoolX »

Datadog wrote:And given all the negative criticisms surrounding "Spider-man 3," I guess the producers were a little desperate when they made the decision to restart the whole thing.
While I never thought SM3 was great, I certainly disagree with a lot of people who say it was terrible. For the third movie in a series, it wasn't too bad at all.
Datadog wrote:Personally, I don't mind them changing actors. I grew up with so [...] many variations on Clark Griswold's children that I'm used to it.
"Hey kids, there's Big Ben again! Parliament!" :D
Datadog wrote:I'm more in favor of the old school "James Bond" approach where when the franchise becomes stale, you just swap out actors and throw the hero into a new adventure. No need to recycle the origin story over and over again. Otherwise, we'd never see James Bond get out of basic training.
Or there might be a good explanation as to why James Bond changes all the time. 8-)
"Er, Tawni, not Tawmni, unless you are doing drag."
-- Collector (commenting on a slight spelling error made by Tawmis)
User avatar
therogue
Sierra Veteran
Posts: 325
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 1:58 pm
Gender: undecided

Re: Spider-Man (Movie Reboot)

Post by therogue »

I suspect that the rushed reboot is also, at least in part due to the studio wanting to hang on to the rights for it. If they didn't develop something within a set time period the rights would go back to Marvel. A Marvel which is also busy churning out movies.

http://filmonic.com/more-on-that-spider-man-reboot-2012

HAH. I love that James Bond theory. It actually has the movies make sense. God I hope the new Bond movie gets made because there has to be more of Craig Bond in the world. *swoon*
User avatar
Datadog
Great Incinerations
Posts: 1603
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:41 am
Location: Vancouver
Gender: Martian
Location: Vancouver, BC
Contact:

Re: Spider-Man (Movie Reboot)

Post by Datadog »

My James Bond question is: if they're all different guys, does MI6 only recruit agents who prefer their drinks shaken, not stirred?
While I never thought SM3 was great, I certainly disagree with a lot of people who say it was terrible. For the third movie in a series, it wasn't too bad at all.
I enjoyed the movie more than I hated it. I mean - yeah, I don't like any part where Aunt May shows up and tells a story, and I found Harry's amnesia side-plot completely unnecessary. Still, the action and effects were great, the basic plot-line was decent enough, Bruce Campbell was awesome, and dare I say it - I laugh every time I see Spider-man dance, and I would never want that ever removed from the movie. I found the rest of the movie just suffered from bad pacing, especially during the crying moments.
User avatar
JasefWisener
Third in Line
Posts: 1016
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 2:57 am
Gender: Male
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: Spider-Man (Movie Reboot)

Post by JasefWisener »

Datadog wrote:
While I never thought SM3 was great, I certainly disagree with a lot of people who say it was terrible. For the third movie in a series, it wasn't too bad at all.
I enjoyed the movie more than I hated it. I mean - yeah, I don't like any part where Aunt May shows up and tells a story, and I found Harry's amnesia side-plot completely unnecessary. Still, the action and effects were great, the basic plot-line was decent enough, Bruce Campbell was awesome, and dare I say it - I laugh every time I see Spider-man dance, and I would never want that ever removed from the movie. I found the rest of the movie just suffered from bad pacing, especially during the crying moments.
That's exactly how I feel about SM3.
"I'm gonna wake up tomorrow and keep trying to do good and so are you and nobody gets to vote on that."
- Justin McElroy, My Brother, My Brother, and Me
Post Reply

Return to “Miscellaneous Chatter”