Copyright and Canada
- MusicallyInspired
- Village Elder
- Posts: 3143
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:46 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Manitoba, Canada
- Contact:
Copyright and Canada
01010100 01110010 01110101 01110011 01110100 00100000 01010100 01001000 00110001
- Datadog
- Great Incinerations
- Posts: 1603
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:41 am
- Location: Vancouver
- Gender: Martian
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Contact:
Re: Copyright and Canada
I've already sent my letter.
I wonder if this one will get as many protesters. People seem to care about Canadian internet even less than Canadian television. Not to mention the name "C-11" doesn't have the same viral quality as "SOPA" (which many people probably thought was a disease).
I wonder if this one will get as many protesters. People seem to care about Canadian internet even less than Canadian television. Not to mention the name "C-11" doesn't have the same viral quality as "SOPA" (which many people probably thought was a disease).
- DeadPoolX
- DPX the Conqueror!
- Posts: 4833
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 3:00 pm
- Gender: XY
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: Copyright and Canada
I think the person who made that website doesn't really understand the bill itself. Having looked at the C-11 bill PDF, it seems like the rules made aren't unreasonable and certainly don't infringe on anyone's rights.
For instance, according to that website, C-11 will potentially block people from recording TV shows and movies to their PVR. However, if you read the bill itself, you'll see that under section 29.23(1) it specifically says that recording TV shows, movies and music is fully legal so long as its for private use, only viewed or listened by the person who recorded it and isn't given or sold to someone else.
In fact, most of section 29 (and all subsections within it) define what is and what isn't allowed with regards to private records, back up copies, etc. As far as I can tell, it seems very agreeable and nowhere near as restricting as that website makes it sound.
For instance, according to that website, C-11 will potentially block people from recording TV shows and movies to their PVR. However, if you read the bill itself, you'll see that under section 29.23(1) it specifically says that recording TV shows, movies and music is fully legal so long as its for private use, only viewed or listened by the person who recorded it and isn't given or sold to someone else.
In fact, most of section 29 (and all subsections within it) define what is and what isn't allowed with regards to private records, back up copies, etc. As far as I can tell, it seems very agreeable and nowhere near as restricting as that website makes it sound.
"Er, Tawni, not Tawmni, unless you are doing drag."
-- Collector (commenting on a slight spelling error made by Tawmis)
-- Collector (commenting on a slight spelling error made by Tawmis)
Re: Copyright and Canada
You can't compare this bill with SOPA. The ramifications of SOPA went well beyond mere protection of intellectual property. It presented real dangers to the DNS, had implications to rights of due process and placed collateral legal/enforcement burdens on others. As long as the scope of a bill is limited to those involved in the infringement and it respects privacy and grants reasonable fair use, it is a lot harder criticize it.
That said, I do think that while creators need to have some protection for their IP, copyright and patent laws need to be limited in terms of scope and time. Civilization and technology are built upon what preceded it. Too onerous and long lasting IP laws are a real hindrance to advancement.
That said, I do think that while creators need to have some protection for their IP, copyright and patent laws need to be limited in terms of scope and time. Civilization and technology are built upon what preceded it. Too onerous and long lasting IP laws are a real hindrance to advancement.
01000010 01111001 01110100 01100101 00100000 01101101 01100101 00100001
- MusicallyInspired
- Village Elder
- Posts: 3143
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:46 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Manitoba, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Copyright and Canada
I admit I didn't read anything yet, just brought it here for public service. I've heard from others that it doesn't seem so bad as well.
01010100 01110010 01110101 01110011 01110100 00100000 01010100 01001000 00110001
- Datadog
- Great Incinerations
- Posts: 1603
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:41 am
- Location: Vancouver
- Gender: Martian
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Contact:
Re: Copyright and Canada
Yeah, the reaction to it seems like an aftermath to SOPA. The available letter to send does bring up a few good points, but it's really more about amending the bill rather than stopping it.
Although the fact that I just sent in my support for amending a minor bill really makes me wonder which non-copyright-related bills should have my proper attention. For all I know, they could be using C-11 to distract people from their "Let's sell Canada to Mexico" bill.
Although the fact that I just sent in my support for amending a minor bill really makes me wonder which non-copyright-related bills should have my proper attention. For all I know, they could be using C-11 to distract people from their "Let's sell Canada to Mexico" bill.
Re: Copyright and Canada
???Datadog wrote:"Let's sell Canada to Mexico" bill.
01000010 01111001 01110100 01100101 00100000 01101101 01100101 00100001
- DeadPoolX
- DPX the Conqueror!
- Posts: 4833
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 3:00 pm
- Gender: XY
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: Copyright and Canada
If anything, Alberta would try to leave Canada and become part of the US, as it threatens to do every so often. None of that is really meant or would ever happen, it's just a minor form of rebellion. It's a lot like how Texas threatens to leave the US every few years, but obviously doesn't.Collector wrote:???Datadog wrote:"Let's sell Canada to Mexico" bill.
Interestingly enough, Texas and Alberta are both involved in the oil business (particularly Houston and Edmonton) and there's a lot of travel back and forth.
Although neither Maia nor I were involved the oil business, I'm from Houston and she was from Edmonton.
In fact, Texas/Alberta relationships are very common -- not quite to the degree that Washington State/British Columbia or New York/Ontario relationships are (if for no other reason, the geographic distance involved), but they happen with some frequency.
"Er, Tawni, not Tawmni, unless you are doing drag."
-- Collector (commenting on a slight spelling error made by Tawmis)
-- Collector (commenting on a slight spelling error made by Tawmis)
- MusicallyInspired
- Village Elder
- Posts: 3143
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:46 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Manitoba, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Copyright and Canada
Alberta is definitely the Texas of Canada.
01010100 01110010 01110101 01110011 01110100 00100000 01010100 01001000 00110001
- DeadPoolX
- DPX the Conqueror!
- Posts: 4833
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 3:00 pm
- Gender: XY
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: Copyright and Canada
The first time I visited Maia in 2006 (back when we were doing the long-distance dating thing), we went to see a comedian at The Comic Strip in West Edmonton Mall. The comedian on stage asked if anyone was from out-of-town and I raised my hand. He asked where I was from and I replied, "Texas."MusicallyInspired wrote:Alberta is definitely the Texas of Canada.
His response? "Ah... Texas. The Alberta of the south!"
"Er, Tawni, not Tawmni, unless you are doing drag."
-- Collector (commenting on a slight spelling error made by Tawmis)
-- Collector (commenting on a slight spelling error made by Tawmis)
- Datadog
- Great Incinerations
- Posts: 1603
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:41 am
- Location: Vancouver
- Gender: Martian
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Contact:
Re: Copyright and Canada
Having spent a good 28 years in Alberta, this whole "Alberta's trying to split" is completely new to me. From my perspective, Quebec was the province that was always trying to become its own country.
Also, I didn't expect my stupid joke to derail the thread like this. I just meant that I find it odd how copyright laws seem to be the hot button at the moment, and yet there's probably dozens of more important bills going through the government right now regarding health, education, taxes, wars, etc. If everyone banded together like this more often, the internet could rule the country. Or maybe copyright laws are simply the only thing we can all agree on.
Also, I didn't expect my stupid joke to derail the thread like this. I just meant that I find it odd how copyright laws seem to be the hot button at the moment, and yet there's probably dozens of more important bills going through the government right now regarding health, education, taxes, wars, etc. If everyone banded together like this more often, the internet could rule the country. Or maybe copyright laws are simply the only thing we can all agree on.
- DeadPoolX
- DPX the Conqueror!
- Posts: 4833
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 3:00 pm
- Gender: XY
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: Copyright and Canada
The main difference is that Alberta was just making a lot of noise, whereas Quebec was actually serious about it.Datadog wrote:Having spent a good 28 years in Alberta, this whole "Alberta's trying to split" is completely new to me. From my perspective, Quebec was the province that was always trying to become its own country.
And you've been here how long now?Datadog wrote:Also, I didn't expect my stupid joke to derail the thread like this.
"Er, Tawni, not Tawmni, unless you are doing drag."
-- Collector (commenting on a slight spelling error made by Tawmis)
-- Collector (commenting on a slight spelling error made by Tawmis)
- Datadog
- Great Incinerations
- Posts: 1603
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:41 am
- Location: Vancouver
- Gender: Martian
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Contact:
Re: Copyright and Canada
Ah, touché.
Re: Copyright and Canada
DeadPoolX wrote:And you've been here how long now?Datadog wrote:Also, I didn't expect my stupid joke to derail the thread like this.
01000010 01111001 01110100 01100101 00100000 01101101 01100101 00100001