Why SIERRA GAMES Failed (And How They Could Have Succeeded)

Talk about anything you want here
User avatar
Rath Darkblade
The Cute One
Posts: 12955
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 5:15 am
Location: Lost in Translation
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Why SIERRA GAMES Failed (And How They Could Have Succeeded)

Post by Rath Darkblade »

Fair enough. I guess I didn't know much about the nature of episodic games - the only Telltale game I bought was Tales of Monkey Island, and I didn't even know about it until I saw it in a computer games store and snatched it up. ;)

But yes, I can understand the disappointment about episodic games. It's too bad about Telltale. I wondered whether they might do future MI games.

Is it Disney now who own the rights to Monkey Island? If so, the future looks bleak for poor ol' Guybrush ... :(
User avatar
MusicallyInspired
Village Elder
Posts: 3143
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:46 am
Gender: Male
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Contact:

Re: Why SIERRA GAMES Failed (And How They Could Have Succeeded)

Post by MusicallyInspired »

Disney owns everything LucasArts did since they bought LucasFilm in 2012 or whenever it was.

I'm glad Telltale is toast, personally.
01010100 01110010 01110101 01110011 01110100 00100000 01010100 01001000 00110001
User avatar
DeadPoolX
DPX the Conqueror!
Posts: 4833
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 3:00 pm
Gender: XY
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Why SIERRA GAMES Failed (And How They Could Have Succeeded)

Post by DeadPoolX »

I think the new KQ failed not because it was episodic (well, that certainly didn't help) but because each chapter felt so incredibly different from one another that it felt like each chapter was designed by entirely different team.

Also, the inability to save when and where you want was a severe drawback. The TellTale games (other than their really early titles) suffered from this problem as well. I know some people don't mind that or, oddly enough, actively like it enough to say something really stupid such as "it means your actions have consequences." To that I reply: screw off*.

Seriously, I play games for fun. If I want something that's hardcore and lacks a save where my actions have long-term consequences, I'll turn off my computer and do stuff in real life.

* This comment is not directed at anyone here. Just the random moron gamer.
"Er, Tawni, not Tawmni, unless you are doing drag."
-- Collector (commenting on a slight spelling error made by Tawmis)
User avatar
Tawmis
Grand Poobah's Servant
Posts: 20954
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 1:19 am
Gender: Not Specified
Contact:

Re: Why SIERRA GAMES Failed (And How They Could Have Succeeded)

Post by Tawmis »

DeadPoolX wrote: Wed Feb 06, 2019 6:32 am I think the new KQ failed not because it was episodic (well, that certainly didn't help) but because each chapter felt so incredibly different from one another that it felt like each chapter was designed by entirely different team.
Also, the inability to save when and where you want was a severe drawback. The TellTale games (other than their really early titles) suffered from this problem as well. I know some people don't mind that or, oddly enough, actively like it enough to say something really stupid such as "it means your actions have consequences." To that I reply: screw off*.
Seriously, I play games for fun. If I want something that's hardcore and lacks a save where my actions have long-term consequences, I'll turn off my computer and do stuff in real life.
* This comment is not directed at anyone here. Just the random moron gamer.
Liar! You know that's directed at me from our discussion on here back in the day! :lol:

These days though, I am more inclined to side with you - with being able to save whenever. Too often, I will be in a game that has "Check Points" and I have to go do something - with no way to just save. I do like "Check Points" as "Auto Save" points. But wish you could manually save these days.
Post Reply

Return to “Miscellaneous Chatter”