Superman Comic sells for $2.16m
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 10:53 pm
Keeping Sierra On-Line Alive
http://forums.sierrahelp.com/
Collector, you should try reading some more "adult" graphic novel series, like Fables or Y: The Last Man. I think you'd like them.Collector wrote:I don't pay much attention to them myself, outside of the rare trip down memory lane. As a kid i certainly read them all of the time.
Here is another 'adult' comic - one that I, as a mere "damn'd furriner" ( ), found very interesting. It concerns the treatment of blacks in early 20th century USA, particularly in the South.DeadPoolX wrote:Collector, you should try reading some more "adult" graphic novel series, like Fables or Y: The Last Man. I think you'd like them.Collector wrote:I don't pay much attention to them myself, outside of the rare trip down memory lane. As a kid i certainly read them all of the time.
Oh and by "adult" I mean written with a story and characters that aren't for kids or teens. Not p0rn, although I'm sure there's plenty of that in comic book form.
See, this is where we're on opposite sides. I have never really cared for DC. The only time I collected DC was before the original 52. I was collecting the reboot of Aquaman, Hawkman, Teen Titans/Titans, and Outsiders. Then they did the original 52 - and it was so chaotic for me (barely having a grasp on DC, having been a Marvel Zombie for over 20 years!) - I bailed out of all DC titles. Then I eventually went back and collected Teen Titans again. But that was it. Then they rebooted with the New 52. And... this is the first time in history I have collected Superman and Batman. Ever. I mean - EVER. This new reboot has me actually collecting FAR more DC than Marvel. (I have dropped so many Marvel titles... and continued to pick up DC titles). I am collecting things like Huntress, Nightwing, Batgirl, Batwing - I mean, just about every DC title that launched from the reboot. There's a few I have since dropped, but the DC titles BY FAR out weigh my Marvel titles. This new DC reboot for me has been golden.Shakar wrote:Count me in as a comic book reader. And yes, I am a girl.
And a huge Superman fan. Though I really despise this new reboot. Up yours DC.
I feel the exact same way. There was really no need for this reboot.Shakar wrote:Though I really despise this new reboot. Up yours DC.
I have a feeling you like the reboot because you weren't attached to the characters from 1986 onward. If nothing else, a reboot makes getting into the DCU easier for those who didn't like DC before or don't want to deal with over two decades worth of backstory.Tawmis wrote:I have never really cared for DC. [...] This new DC reboot for me has been golden.
I liked the idea that was really Clark Kent, who played his role as Superman. That's different from some other heroes (like Batman) who feel they're the hero first and the person second.Shakar wrote:What kills me with this reboot...in terms of Superman...is that Clark Kent is dead. WTF. You want to make Superman relatable? Clark Kent, growing up with the Kents, those values are what make him human. More human than most really.
I recall DC saying that "marriage is boring." Honestly, I preferred it. The whole "hide-your-identity-from-her" thing was ridiculously stupid and only really worked in Pre-Crisis without seeming cheesy.Shakar wrote:And Post-Crisis Supes and Lois were the best.
Well, yes. I said as much in my post that I never cared for DC - especially Batman and Superman, and that I had been a Marvel fan (Zombie) for well over 20 years (which when I think of it, and properly add my age, it's actually about 35 years...)DeadPoolX wrote:I have a feeling you like the reboot because you weren't attached to the characters from 1986 onward. If nothing else, a reboot makes getting into the DCU easier for those who didn't like DC before or don't want to deal with over two decades worth of backstory.Tawmis wrote:I have never really cared for DC. [...] This new DC reboot for me has been golden.
Couldn't agree with you more. You earn brownie points my friendDeadPoolX wrote:I liked the idea that was really Clark Kent, who played his role as Superman. That's different from some other heroes (like Batman) who feel they're the hero first and the person second.Shakar wrote:What kills me with this reboot...in terms of Superman...is that Clark Kent is dead. WTF. You want to make Superman relatable? Clark Kent, growing up with the Kents, those values are what make him human. More human than most really.
I recall DC saying that "marriage is boring." Honestly, I preferred it. The whole "hide-your-identity-from-her" thing was ridiculously stupid and only really worked in Pre-Crisis without seeming cheesy.Shakar wrote:And Post-Crisis Supes and Lois were the best.
Yeah, Marvel doesn't really do "reboots" as much. I'd say they more or less "forget" what happened before or somehow find a weird way to work it into the current continuity.Tawmis wrote:But on the flip side, I could completely understand it. Considering the EXTENSIVE X-Men and Avengers I have - if they rebooted Marvel, it'd essentially make those stories (in terms of continuity) null and void. And that would be annoying. I am just saying, as someone that was a VERY skeptical DC fan, the reboot (and how they did it) was an excellent jumping point for me (especially with the horrid work Marvel has been dishing out, with VERY few exceptions).
The really sad thing is Morrison used to be a good writer. Ever since Final Crisis (which made no sense at all) he's gone downhill.Shakar wrote:Morrison can't write logically...at all. But which ones have you been reading and which ones do you like most?